Saturday, November 24, 2007

It's 7:56 PM and GT still sucks!

Always fun to beat the Jackets. As Munson kept saying, it was a very odd game with two fumbles in the end zone (that could have been disastrous) that turned into touchbacks instead of points for Tech. Tons of credit to Knowshon and Ramarcus Brown who after making mistakes (not catching the lateral and getting in Mikey Henderson's way during a punt, respectively) who erased their mistakes by hustling back to the ball, and Knowshon knocked the ball out of the back of the end zone and Brown recovered it after the ball doinked off of his helmet or shoulder pads. Those two plays were the 14 points that gave us the game. Naturally, there were plenty of other plays that gave us a lead and other players, but to me those were the momentum savers that would have given Tech leads and possibly given them the game.

BUT! BUT!

31-17. I've said it a few times in the past and the first time on here, but the Dawgs could go 1-10 and the 1 win be against Tech and the season wouldn't be a total loss.

So far as my prediction for a 24-10, I got the 14 point spread, but a little off on the score. And with the Jackets teeing off on Knowshon, I picked the wrong back to reach the century mark for the Dawgs, and Choice, as expected had over 100 yards. Now, the good news for the future, we should have a change of pace back for Knowshon next year in Caleb King who can do what Brown did tonight and burn defenses who are focusing too much on Knowshon. Oh, and there's the fact that Teck probably will suffer from QB-fruit-basket turnover if Gailey sticks around. And there lies the problem with that. They could get a decent coach who knows how to use his quarterbacks . . . but it seems mediocrity has been 'ok' on the Flats of late.

Here's to making it 8 next year and increasing the misery for the Bugs to match the famous 'Drought' for the Dawgs back in the 50s. (Coincidentally, this year marks the 50th anniversary of Theron Sapp earning his nickname as the 'Drought-breaker.' The Boner-Herald has an article on that today.) How important is it to beat Tech? Sapp, who had a decent career, making All-SEC twice, but joined the ranks of Walker, Sinkwich, and Trippi based largely on his 1957 performance against Tech, recovering a fumble playing as a back-up on defense and scoring the game's lone TD on the drive immediately following the recovery. 34, 21, 62, and . . . 40, the 'Drought-breaker.'

Rivalry Weekend
I'll have to say that in terms of this being a big weekend for rivalries and big games. This weekend hasn't disappointed in terms of games not being complete blow-outs (OU & UF aside), and we'll see what Damn-burn and Bama do in the Iron Bowl. And so far Mizzou & KU have been after each other AND a stopped fake field goal!

As for the SECCG, sometimes you win sometimes you lose, but as a redeeming balm we have what looks to be good bowl possibilities . . .

Bowls
Now to wait for the bowl line-up. I'd be shocked, at this point, if the Dawgs don't make the BCS this year, despite not playing for the SECC. After this week, the Dawgs should be no lower than no. 5 in the polls and possibly as high as no. 4. For a shot at the National Title, so many weird things would have to happen between now and then that were it any other year, I'd say there were no way for it to happen, and I still would be wonderfully shocked if it did happen. But right now, I'm picking the Dawgs in either the Rose against USC or the Orange against the ACC Champion (which ever team doesn't play to lose next week). Naturally both those scenarios depend on who wins where next week.

. . . All for now
. . . And to HELL with Ga Tech!

The Trade School & Bowl changes

As I'm watching the Hawaii-Boise St. game with my Dad, we both agree that we want nothing to do with either of them in the bowl games if we make it to the BCS. Hawaii because they throw the ball and throw the ball & throw the ball some more. Brennan had over 400 yds passing at the end of the 3rd quarter . . . no thank you.

The good news (I think) is that LSU's loss should mean that if UGA doesn't play in the SECCG (which I'd much rather do, but that's not up to the Dawgs just now) that they could end up in the Orange, Fiesta, or Rose since the SEC Champ would land in the Sugar and probably play Boise or Hawaii. So it's up in the air pending tomorrow's results

BUT

. . . if the Dawgs don't handle the Gnats, it's all pointless talk so, that said . . . tomorrow's opponent, you really don't need any introduction, but . . .

If two of the greatest Bulldogs ever hate Georgia Teck, shouldn't you? Dan Magill and Bill Hartman remind everyone how they should feel about Tech, they're even worse if they win!

Georgia Institute of Technology
(they're not actually a University, don't let them forget that)
First played: 1893
Meeting No.: 100th meeting
Series Record: 58-36-5 (thank GOD for Dooley's 16-9 mark against GT, otherwise it's nearly a dead heat and the Teckies are even more annoying than ever)
Our Nicknames for them: Gnats, Teckies, Nerds, Bugs, pick your favorite
Their nicknames for them: Yellow Jackets
Their nicknames for us (read: 'reasons to hate this team more'): UGAG, Puppies, Cesspool of the South--this one really gets my goat (speaking of, thank God we didn't go w/ the Goats for our mascots!). Rivalry Meter (Level of Hatred 1 = you should beat this team like a drum, almost like when we used to play regularly Mercer way back in the 189os; 10=The Great Satan, Steve Spurrier): 9, simply b/c we've beaten them 6 years in a row isn't a reason for forgetting how f-ing annoying they are when they win. Hell, they're annoying when they lose, what am I talking about?! I would thoroughly enjoy another 51-7 shellacking, but what Dawg fan wouldn't!
Prediction: Like UGA last week against UK with Sr. Day, GT comes out flat, and that means trouble for the Jackets who will play tough and keep it closer than it should be taking advantage of at least one UGA mistake: Choice gets over 100 yds; and Knowshon 100+; UGA 24 GT 10. If the Dawgs play mistake free and like they did in the 1st & 4th quarters against Auburn: UGA 45 GT 17

WRECK TECK! Here's hoping we can make it 7 in a row and UK can pull off the upset against UT!!!

. . . All for now
. . . And to HELL with Ga Tech!

DCC
24 November 2007

Friday, November 23, 2007

. . . All Hail to Dear Ol' UGA!

Believe it or not, THAT is the ending to Georgia's fight song, that's 'Hail to Georgia!' (bet you don't know the words or the tune--if you've played as a Redcoat you know the tune). 'Glory! Glory!' is nice and it gets the blood flowing, but there are all of four words in it. Of course, when you've had a few tailgating it's definitely easier to remember. I've always found it curious that 'Glory!' was written to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic, particularly when most Southerners until recently would have refused to have anything to do with it as a 'Yankee tune.' But, that's neither here nor there . . .

'Hail to Georgia!'
I'm setting this up as a way to share my passion and love for my alma mater ('03-AB History, AB Political Science), both the school itself and things football related. As you may guess from my history degree, I'll several posts regarding the history of the school and the football and other athletics programs. I'll also post a good bit about miscellaneous college football debates and topics that I come across in conversations or on the internet. There will likely be some discussion of Big Eleven Conference topics as I went to grad school at Ohio State.


Before anyone asks, my loyalties are and ever will be with the Dawgs. In fact, my top favorite teams would probably rank something like this

1. UGA
2. UGA
3. UGA
4.
anyone who beats UF
5. SEC (I generally find myself pulling against UF though--see my #4 team)
6. Ohio State
7. anyone who beats Michigan (yeah, I developed a hatred for 'that Team up north' while in Columbus)

And I could probably put UGA as 'all' of my top 10 favorite teams, but you get the idea. To steal from the old bumper sticker: My blood bleeds RED & BLACK with
a high sUGAr content! I went to UGA football games in the womb, and Dad swears I was 'born barking, and had a relapse.' More on family connections in another post.

Now for a bit of explanation on the blog's name . . .

Iron Pillars
For the name of the blog, I wanted to touch on both the University of Georgia and athletics (read football). So for the 'Iron Pillars' part: it relates to the three pillars of the Arch, which has been at UGA as a part of a gate & fence system that was put up in the 1850s to keep the livestock from Athens & the surrounding countryside out of the University. Now, the joke goes that the Arch & fence keep the animals in (lame I know, but it comes from being a UGA Orientation Leader).
The Arch, before the 2007 Troy game.

The Arch itself once had gates in between the pillars and has served as the gateway to UGA since its installation. The Arch is borrowed from the State Seal of Georgia and the three pillars of the Arch represent Wisdom, Justice, and Moderation, and now is one of the most recognizable symbols of UGA.

I could go on with several traditions and stories about the Arch (and probably will later), Freshmen not being allowed to walk under it, many students choosing not to walk under it until they were alumni, it's status as a target for pranks by Teckies, etc.

That's for the Iron Pillars.

Silver Britches
For Dawg fans, this is really a non-requirement for explanation, but for those poor deprived souls. The Dawgs almost exclusively wore the Silver Britches until Dooley came in in 1964 and changed to white pants with a large red stripe. The Silver Britches made their reappearance in the 1980 Texas A&M game and we all know what happened that year. The Silver Britches didn't go away. Since then the Dawgs have worn the Silver Britches weekly on the gridiron with the exception of the following games and sartorial alterations (most of which have been a BAD idea)

Red Pants: 1980s Clemson (can't remember when) & 1988 S. Carolina. I'd actually love to see make a comeback for a big away game every now & then. Of course, the red pants are most famous for their appearance in Knoxville when as certain no. 34 made his college debut. I know there were other games when the Dawgs wore red pants before the Silver Britches made their 1980 comeback, one of which was the game in Lexington when Rex Robinson hit a FG to beat UK in the closing minute & Munson's call was 'Yea! Yea! Yea! Yea!' (apologies if there were a couple more 'Yea's' in there). Other than that I don't know. If anyone knows/remembers shoot me a message.

Black Pants: 1998 Wisconsin (Outback Bowl) & 1998 Cocktail Party. While the Black jerseys have been imprinted in the UGA fans memories forever, the pants were nice until the novelty wore off and we got the crap kicked out of us by UF, may they never be revived.

White Pants: 1999 LSU, UT, & 2000 Ga Tech. During the LSU game, they were worn in memory of offensive line coach Pat Watson, who had died the previous week after the UCF game. Coincidentally enough, Donnan thought having pants that looked like the Cream-cicles from Knoxville would help snap the then-10 yr drought vs. the Vols. We know how history worked there: 39-20 Vols and with similar results against the Gnats (27-15) in what would be Donnan's last game before being booted and the last loss that the Dawgs have had to endure against the Trade School. May the white pants be burned and never return.

So, all that said, the Iron Pillars are for the Arch, and the Silver Britches are for the 'britches' the Dawgs wear on Saturday.

. . . All for now
. . . And to HELL w/ GA Tech!

DCC
23 November 2007